Role of inflammatory and pain genes polymorphisms in temporomandibular disorder and pressure pain sensitivity.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the correlation of inflammatory and pain genes polymorphisms with the presence of temporomandibular disorder (TMD) patients and with pressure pain sensitivity. DESIGN: Data was collected from 268 consecutive subjects at Bauru School of Dentistry. Subjects aged younger than 20 years, with dental and neuropathic pain, sinusitis, cognitive and neurologic disorder were excluded. Included subjects were evaluated using the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular disorders and divided into two groups: TMD cases and healthy controls. Groups were submitted to pressure pain threshold (PPT) test for the temporomandibular joint, anterior temporalis and masseter muscles and genotyped for Val158Met, IL6-174, IL-1ß-3954 and TNFA-308. Student's t-test and Pearson chi-square test were used to comparisons between groups. A linear multiple regression was used to evaluate the influence of genetics variables on the PPT and a bivariate analysis was used to assesses the influence of genetics variables on pain sensitivity below the PPT cut off of the structures in TMD group. RESULTS: TMD group showed significantly lower PPT values for all structures when compared with control group (p < 0.001). SNP IL6-174 predicted higher pain sensitivity in the temporomandibular joint (p < 0.005) and in anterior temporalis muscle (p < 0.044) and SNP Val158Met in the masseter muscle (p < 0.038); when TMD group was divided according to PPT cut-off values the SNP Val158Met influenced increase pain sensibility in the masseter muscle. CONCLUSION: TNFA-308 was associated with TMD and SNP IL6-174 and SNP Val158Met influenced pain sensitivity of patients with TMD.

Gelatin-based membrane containing usnic acid-loaded liposomes: A new treatment strategy for corneal healing.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and potential healing efficacy of the topical ocular administration of a gelatin membrane containing usnic acid/liposomes (UALs) for corneal cicatrization. UALs have shown healing activity in animal models of dermal burn lesions. We evaluated the safety of topical ocular administration of UAL and its potential healing efficacy as an ophthalmic treatment on chemical lesions in rabbit eyes. METHOD: The Draize test was used to check for ocular toxicity and the score was zero at each observation, indicating the ocular safety of a gelatin membrane containing usnic acid/liposome. Its potential healing efficacy as an ophthalmic treatment on chemical lesions in rabbit eyes was also assessed. RESULTS: After epithelial removal and treatment with UAL, there was a 49.4 % reduction in injury under in vivo conditions compared with a 36.6 % reduction in the control, a gelatin membrane containing liposome without usnic acid. Histological analysis of ocular surface chemical injury-tissue sections after treatment with UAL supported these observations. The corneal expression of VEGF and TGF-ß1increased by 70 % and 50 % respectively following treatment with UAL gelatin membrane. CONCLUSION: These results indicate the potential therapeutic application of UAL gelatin membranes as an ophthalmic treatment that may be used for corneal cicatrization.

Alveolar bone healing in mice genetically selected in the maximum (AIRmax) or minimum (AIRmin) inflammatory reaction.

The exact role of inflammatory immune response in bone healing process is still unclear, but the success of the alveolar bone healing process seems to be associated with a moderate and transitory inflammatory response, while insufficient or exacerbated responses seems to have a detrimental influence in the healing outcome. In this context, we performed a comparative analysis of mice strains genetically selected for maximum (AIRmax) or minimum (AIRmin) acute inflammatory response to address the influence of inflammation genes in alveolar bone healing outcome. Experimental groups comprised 8-week-old male or female AIRmax and AIRmin submitted to extraction of upper right incisor, and evaluated at 0, 3, 7, 14 and 21 days after upper incision extraction by micro-computed tomography (µCT), histomorphometry, birefringence, immunohistochemistry and molecular (PCRArray) analysis. Overall, the results demonstrate a similar successful bone healing outcome at the endpoint was evidenced in both AIRmin and AIRmax strains. The histormophometric analysis reveal a slight but significant decrease in blood clot and inflammatory cells density, as well a delay in the bone formation in AIRmax strain in the early times, associated with a decreased expression of BMP2, BMP4, BMP7, TGFb1, RUNX2, and ALP. The evaluation of inflammatory cells nature reveals increased GR1+ cells counts in AIRmax strain at 3d, associated with increased levels of neutrophil chemoattractants such as CXCL1 and CXCL2, and its receptor CXCR1, while F4/80+ cell prevails in AIRmin strain at 7d. Also, our results demonstrate a relative predominance of M2 macrophages in AIRmin strain, associated with an increased expression of ARG1, IL10, TGFb, while M1 macrophages prevail in AIRmax, which parallel with increased IL-1B, IL-6 and TNF expression. At late repair stage, AIRmax presents evidences of increased bone remodeling, characterized by increased density of blood vessels and osteoclasts in parallel with decreased bone matrix density, as well increased levels of MMPs, osteoclastogenic and osteocyte markers. In the view of contrasting inflammatory and healing phenotypes of AIRmin and AIRmax strains in other models, the unpredicted phenotype observed suggests the existence of specific QTLs (Quantitative trait loci) responsible for the regulation 'sterile' inflammation and bone healing events. Despite the similar endpoint healing, AIRmax strain delayed repair was associated with increased presence of neutrophils and M1 macrophages, supporting the association of M2 cells with faster bone healing. Further studies are required to clarify the elements responsible for the regulation of inflammatory events at bone healing sites, as well the determinants of bone healing outcome.